Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | Floyd L. Davidson |
| Date | 2014-09-16 12:36 (2014-09-16 02:36) |
| Message-ID | <87lhpjzwb6.fld@barrow.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Savageduck |
| Followups | Savageduck (4h & 16m) > Floyd L. Davidson nospam (4h & 25m) > Floyd L. Davidson |
Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>wrote:
SavageduckIt's not a "reversible" workflow. The correct terms would be either a non-linear undo, or simply that it can be reverted.
So? The fact still remains, regardless of personal opinion about Adobe, Lightroom, & Photoshop, those using that software have the ability to maintain a fully non-destructive, and reversible workflow, that includes reversing the effects of any filter including USM.
âEUR¦and if you are going to start that reverse mathematical operation from a compressed, & lossy JPEG, good luck getting back to where you started.Your workflow, even if non-destructive, will be totally unable to deal with reverting any previous editing with the exception of processes, such as sharpen (not USM), that are reversible.
-- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/ Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@apaflo.com
2014-09-13-
