Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | Floyd L. Davidson |
| Date | 2014-09-17 08:32 (2014-09-16 22:32) |
| Message-ID | <87iokmycye.fld@barrow.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | nospam |
nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>wrote:
nospamThe OP and everyone who is interested in the topic at hand.
In article <sf2i1a1ai44fng06d14caf73520h0h9bd0@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:nospamEric StevensFloyd L. Davidsonnospam
That is a good move on your part. Start sticking with what Adobe calls it, and in the process use appropriate terms.
adobe didn't come up with the name. it's what everyone calls it, because it's non-destructive.
But that doesn't make the processes employed reversible.
who cares.
what matters is the results, not micromanaging every step of the way.That's why nobody calls it a reversible workflow except you?
a non-destructive workflow is reversible. period.
They don't call it that because it isn't that. They call it this because this is what it is, and this isn't that.
-- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/ Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@apaflo.com
2014-09-13-
