Skip to main content
news

Re: Lenses and sharpening

Eric Stevens
SubjectRe: Lenses and sharpening
FromEric Stevens
Date2014-09-22 22:13 (2014-09-23 08:13)
Message-ID<vi012a998occ3qefc4am4lve3vdm7tcq4m@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsSandman
FollowupsSavageduck (1h & 55m) > Eric Stevens
Sandman (16h & 22m)

On 22 Sep 2014 07:29:43 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
In article <l6ju1ap2gt4oarggc5a0jh0n8irdeml5li@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:

Eric Stevens
No, quite correct. See, for example: http://tinyurl.com/mbrhs3e

Sandman
Again, thermodynamics have nothing to do with image processing.

Eric Stevens
A *lot* of people don't agree with you.

Sandman
Incorrect.

Eric Stevens
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/adobe-media-server/articles/h264_encoding.html

Sandman
Not a single word about thermodynamics, also has nothibng to with with image processing.

Eric Stevens
http://www.johnloomis.org/ece563/notes/basics/entropy/entropy.html "In the case of an image ... "

Sandman
Not a single word about thermodynamics, also has nothing to do with image processing

Eric Stevens
http://brainacle.com/calculating-image-entropy-with-python-how-and-why.html

Sandman
Not a single word about thermodynamics, also has nothing to do with using maximum entropy in image processing.

Eric Stevens
http://www.esrf.eu/computing/Forum/imgCIF/PAPER/entropy.html

Sandman
Not a single word about thermodynamics, also has nothing to do with image processing.

Eric Stevens
http://www.naturephotographers.net/articles0808/ip0808-1.html

Sandman
First link that quotes the second law of thermodynamics, but alas - it has nothing to do with neither image processing or using maximum entropy in image processing. This is a text about artistically interesting images based on their percieved entropy.

Eric Stevens
You can carry on from there.

Sandman
My god, this was the hardest you've ever failed thus far. You have to stop google-linking stuff you haven't looked at yourself even.

This is what happens when you spout off about things you know nothing about, you're reduced to google like crazy to try to find *something* that may related to what you think you're saying.

You're flailing, Eric.

Eric Stevens
And you are way out of your depth.

Sandman
Ironic.

Eric Stevens
Like an anchor.

Sandman
Indeed. There is no way to recover from this, I'm afraid. You'll forever be the clueless moron that has to comment on things he knows nothing about. I won't claim you had any credibility before this, because you didn't, but you sure went the extra mile to make sure no one ever mistakes you for having it.

There should be some nett merit in talking to you but I'm fraid there isn't. This time when you go down you will stay down.

->PLONK <- --

Regards,

Eric Stevens

Savageduck (1h & 55m) > Eric Stevens
Sandman (16h & 22m)