Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | Eric Stevens |
| Date | 2014-09-19 11:26 (2014-09-19 21:26) |
| Message-ID | <ugtn1al270tpnkd2ev7consvp0gdp8t40n@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | nospam |
| Followups | Sandman (2h & 39m) |
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 02:51:56 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
nospam... and then export a new and different image. But you can't generally take the first image that you have exported and then edit it back to it's original state, and certainly not if you have sharpened with USM.
In article <kgcn1at99rogclf1uf77b4ugulal0snr3g@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:nospamwith a non-destructive workflow, they can do that. without a non-destructive workflow, the changes cannot be reversed.Eric Stevens
Once they have executed the list of edits by exporting a file the changes can't generally be reversed either.
sure they can.
click on the adjustment you want to change and alter or reset it to 0 or whatever you want.
You mean the list of edits saved in the database?nospamEric StevensEric Stevensnospam
And I have pointed out that you cannot reverse a change which has not actually been made. Even if it is reversible, you can't reverse something before you have done it.
the change *has* been made, just not to the pixels themselves.
And to what has the change been made?
the database.
--nospamas i said, you're confused.Eric Stevens
I'm confused?
yes
Regards,
Eric Stevens
2014-09-13-
