Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 2014-09-20 13:12 (2014-09-20 13:12) |
| Message-ID | <slrnm1qool.hiv.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Eric Stevens (12h & 11m) > Sandman |
In article <j1op1atl8evat6nqt8a91mrt2mr490b8pu@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:
You failed again. Are you jusyt wildly googling and hoping that something will support your incorrect claims? Seems that way.SandmanEric StevensSandmanEric Stevensnospam
Floyd's usage is strictly in accordance with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_process_%28thermodynamics%29 as it applies information theory. If you think there is no room for reversible processes in information theory see http://tinyurl.com/otp5pug
since when does editing digital images on a computer become a thermodynamics problem?
Since half past never.
Wrong.
I.e. correct.Eric StevensEric StevensSandman
See my reply to nospam.
Nothing in your reply makes image processing be the same as thermodynamics, Eric. You're blathering about things you know nothing about.
See http://tinyurl.com/mbrhs3e
Google is not your friend, Eric.
-- Sandman[.net]
2014-09-13-
