Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 2014-09-22 09:08 (2014-09-22 09:08) |
| Message-ID | <slrnm1vj8k.3ss.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Eric Stevens (2h & 34m) > Sandman |
In article <0kdu1ad0vrvdhcprkbhke1vc68ju103drm@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:
And you should. But that's not what you told nospam, still quoted above. You told him that "that's why I asked him that particular question" as a reply to nospam's claim about LR always using the original data. You didn't ask me that question because you didn't know. But you should have.Eric StevensSandmanEric StevensSandmannospamEric Stevens
questions like this mean you don't understand how it works.
it *always* uses the original data. the cached previews are a speed optimization for the user interface.
That's why I asked him that particular question.
No, you asked it because you have no clue how LR works.
I don't know why you don't bother writing my posts for me: you seem to know *exactly* what I really meant. :-(
No, I am telling you the reason why you asked a question, not what you "meant". The reason for the question was ignorance on your part.
I generally ask questions because of something I don't know.
-- Sandman[.net]
2014-09-13-
