Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 2014-09-24 04:21 (2014-09-23 22:21) |
| Message-ID | <230920142221257966%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | PeterN |
| Followups | PeterN (6h & 36m) > nospam |
In article <lvt7cp12eun@news3.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter@verizon.net> wrote:
no you didn't.PeterNI forgot to mention the age of the article,
I noticed and was hoping nosense would have conducted his own exeriments. I went back and forth and saw no change in output. Proof of a concept includes statement of the methodology, together with a display of the results, in such manner that anyone can reproduce the results. When the claiment resorts to name calling, there can be little realistic hope of proof.
and that several versions of PS have come and gove.that does not matter because the math hasn't changed.
you're weaseling.
That article is no proof of anything current.in other words, you admit that you're full of shit.
2014-09-13-
