Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | Eric Stevens |
| Date | 2014-09-20 07:01 (2014-09-20 17:01) |
| Message-ID | <8g2q1ahcvn7v2bkq6rpvbd3d99i3rhfskd@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | nospam |
| Followups | Savageduck (58m) > Eric Stevens |
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 23:51:48 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
nospamSigh ... --
In article <lhsp1atceq8is7jjri2s52jqukk40abvng@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:nospamEric StevensEric Stevensnospam
When I (and Floyd) say 'fully reversible' we are using a very specific meaning.
and everyone else is using a different meaning, one which both of you stubbornly refuse to acknowledge.
Good Lord. What on earth do you think I have been doing!
certainly not that.Eric Stevensnospam
Floyd used a very specific meaning the significance of which you have been ignoring from the outset.
nope. i didn't ignore it at all.Eric Stevensnospam
You have insisted in trying to force on him an entirely different meaning which, if accepted, would have him saying something entirely different.
also false.Eric Stevensnospam
But you have turned your face away from what he was trying to say ...
nope.
if there's anyone who has turned their faces it's you and floyd.
Regards,
Eric Stevens
2014-09-13-
