Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 2014-09-21 12:25 (2014-09-21 12:25) |
| Message-ID | <slrnm1tad8.uqn.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Eric Stevens (11h & 41m) |
In article <6h2s1a9hbbolv6maqafjva0rss4ouakcoo@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:
Best endorsement I could ever get - ignorant troll says I'm not "qualified". Haha!Eric StevensSandmanSandmanFloyd L. Davidson
The point we're making fun of is that you did add a lossy middle step to your claim about the first process being reversed by the third process with a lossy process in the middle.
The JPEG lossy format doesn't allow the original image to be resurected, but it doesn't prevent reversing the sharpening.
And that's what we're making fun of. The sharpening was added before the lossy process was added. You can counteract it, and you may be satisfied with it, but you haven't reversed it.
You are not qualified to voice an opinion.
-- Sandman[.net]
2014-09-13-
