Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 2014-09-22 14:01 (2014-09-22 14:01) |
| Message-ID | <slrnm204cc.671.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
In article <dgqv1al47890n0t8n6mmrim2dcv1k2tkjj@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:
Uh, no. It may potentially be a space hog yes, but not due to the size of the prints you make. It has *nothing* to do with printing or exporting.Eric StevensSandmanSandmanEric Stevens
Nope. LR doesn't render a preview when it exports an image.
Then from where does it get the preview that is bigger than it has cached?
The cached preview is 1:1 if you've worked with it.
That potentially makes it a space hog if you produce large prints.
Every single image you've worked with in LR has a 1:1 preview made for it.
DxO doesn't save a preview but does save all the edits in an XMP sidecar.Cool, this discussion has been about LR. I won't make any comments about DxO because I'm not familiar enough with it. You know, as opposed to you - who isn't familiar with LR but keep making incorrect claims about it.
So too does NX-D. NX-2 stuffs (possibly multiple) sidecars in an edited NEF file. However, none of these have LR's cataloguing.We all know this.
-- Sandman[.net]
2014-09-13-
