Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 2014-09-30 20:21 (2014-09-30 14:21) |
| Message-ID | <300920141421044392%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | PeterN |
| Followups | Eric Stevens (3h & 46m) > nospam PeterN (6h & 2m) > nospam |
In article <m0c13t09k1@news1.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter@verizon.net> wrote:
you're the one who brought it up.PeterNnospamPeterNnospamPeterNPeterNnospam
I forgot to mention the age of the article,
no you didn't.
Show me where
one cannot prove a negative.
IOW. You made another unprovable statement. I said that I did not mention hte dae of an articel. YOu said I did. I asked where. The only thing unprovable is the truth of your statement.
i said you didn't *forget*, not that it matters since the date is completely irrelevant and you know it. it's nothing more than a diversion because you are completely full of shit.
If it doesn't matter, why do you bring it up.
you're trying to claim that somehow the math for the rgb->lab transform has somehow changed in the time the article has been written. that's absurd. it hasn't. only an idiot would make that claim.
Once again your use of a pejortive proves you are sick and have a need to keep arguing. this link may help you.take your own advice. you're the one who drops the first pejoratives.
<http://www.psych.org/>
2014-09-13-
