nospam
In article <lvpc9u01no0@news6.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter@verizon.net> wrote:

the proof is in the link and has already been pointed out more than once. it's a simple thing to do. have you done it? no. instead, you spew nonsense, demonstrating just how much of an idiot you are.

PeterN
You made a statement, I asked for proof, and you trun to pejoratives.

nospam
proof was provided.

if you aren't going to bother reading it (even before you asked) and doing what it describes, then my response is very appropriate and not pejorative at all.

PeterN
No 132 "proof was provided."

nospam
it was.

PeterN
I knew tht answer before you posted it. Though posssibly you might have used "you wouldn't understand it."

nospam
you don't.

PeterN
Since you htink I am hat dumb, in the interesting of communicationg, restate your "proof."

nospam
read the link eric provided.

either it's over your head or you'd rather argue.

<https://www.ledet.com/margulis/ACT_postings/ColorCorrection/ACT-LAB-damage.htm>

PeterN
Typical error 404

nospam
it worked for you the first time.

either that or you're lying.