Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 2014-09-15 18:53 (2014-09-15 12:53) |
| Message-ID | <150920141253216111%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Floyd L. Davidson |
| Followups | android (35m) Floyd L. Davidson (1h & 50m) > nospam |
In article <877g1425ym.fld@barrow.com>, Floyd L. Davidson <floyd@apaflo.com>wrote:
i absolutely do know the meaning, since it's all i use.Floyd L. DavidsonFloyd L. Davidsonnospam
UnSharpMask is not reversible.
it is with a non-destructive workflow.
I'm sorry that you don't understand the meaning of that.
it's you who doesn't understand what a non-destructive workflow means and as a result, says stupid shit like what you just did.
with a non-destructive workflow, unsharp mask (or anything else for that matter) can be altered or removed after the fact. that's why it's called a non-destructive workflow.
2014-09-13-
