Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 2014-09-24 00:20 (2014-09-23 18:20) |
| Message-ID | <230920141820119540%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | PeterN |
| Followups | PeterN (3h & 17m) |
In article <lvsqsa12u6m@news4.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter@verizon.net> wrote:
yes, you are.PeterNnospamEric StevensPeterNnospam
Typical error 404
it worked for you the first time.
either that or you're lying.
He probably didn't notice that the tail of the URL had wrapped.
it does not matter if the url wrapped or not.
the url is properly delimited so that software can detect the entire url and present it as a clickable link, regardless of embedded linebreaks.
he has been caught lying once again.
Wrong
first you say the link is true (which means you didn't get a 404) and then when i said the proof was contained in it, you claimed to get a 404 as an excuse.
both cannot be true which means you're a liar.
2014-09-13-
