Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | Eric Stevens |
| Date | 2014-09-18 02:37 (2014-09-18 12:37) |
| Message-ID | <u5ak1apeae5nav13mgprk2hojbr016ttqt@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (7h & 26m) > Eric Stevens |
On 17 Sep 2014 09:32:27 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
SandmanOn this occasion, at least, Floyd most certainly knows what he is talking about. A problem seems to be that very few other people seem to. --
In article <p9ki1a5t2urc3vp30n1rddb10l9fn0njaa@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:SandmannospamEric StevensFloyd L. Davidsonnospam
That is a good move on your part. Start sticking with what Adobe calls it, and in the process use appropriate terms.
adobe didn't come up with the name. it's what everyone calls it, because it's non-destructive.
But that doesn't make the processes employed reversible.
who cares.what matters is the results, not micromanaging every step of the way.a non-destructive workflow is reversible. period.Eric Stevens
So you accept that you are not talking about the same thing that Floyd was talking about, and that you don't care.
Floyd has no idea what he's talking about, so as soon as someone knows what they're talking about, they're by definition not talking about whatever it is Floyd is babbling about.
Regards,
Eric Stevens
2014-09-13-
