Subject | Re: Google's answer to the iPad3 has just arrived... |
From | KDT |
Date | 11/03/2012 17:20 (11/03/2012 09:20) |
Message-ID | <422ad8d5-b6ae-4797-b9b4-94e81f75c4ba@googlegroups.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Flint |
Flint
On 11/3/2012 8:41 AM, KDT wrote:
"Which users don't really care about any more than they did about CPU "So now users don't care about quality of apps or perforkance?Hmmm... (checking)... nope! I don't see where I used the words
How so? You mentioned price/performance -- i.e. a ratio of price to performance. So the iPad 4 is 25% more expensive but has more than 25% better performance -- i.e. it has a better price performance ration.Earlier you were carping about "price/performance" so the iPad 4 is 25% more expensive but at thelowend 33% faster and depending on then benchmark 300% faster.So if users don't care about any of those things, it should be reflected in sales figures by the end of the quarter, right?Non sequitur duly noted.
Are you predicting that users will buy more Nexus 7's than iPads?
LOL!
You'd love an open ended bet such as that, wouldn't you? :)Well, you claimed to know what people prefer and what they care about -- so now since both Google and Apple offer 7ish inch tablets and 10 inch tablets, peoples preference should be reflected in sales figures shouldn't they?
Can you be a little *more* vague? I noticed the "more iPads" instead
of a more meaningful comparison between
tablets of a similar size.