Google| Subject | Re: Google's answer to the iPad3 has just arrived... |
| From | Flint |
| Date | 11/01/2012 18:14 (11/01/2012 13:14) |
| Message-ID | <k6ualo$bt6$1@dont-email.me> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | KDT |
On 11/1/2012 7:15 AM, KDT wrote:
KDTI did no such thing. That is, unless you think a 8 iPad is more pocketable than an Android 7" tablet. 'Pocketable' was *your* criteria, never mine. That was what I was comparing. Sorry if you don't get the IPOD TOUCH >>>>>>XL<<<<<< comment.
On Thursday, November 1, 2012 1:32:26 AM UTC-4, Flint wrote:Flint
On 10/29/2012 8:34 PM, KDT wrote:KDTFlint
Yeah, so who ever buy a media player that you can fit in your pocket (i.e. the iPod Touch) instead of a 10" tablet..... I don't think they make armbands large enough for a tablet....
Goal post shift. I was making an a *mini iPad* and *Nexus 10*
price/performance comparison. While a mini ipad may be an ipod touch
*XL*, I do get to use a similar dodge Apple fanboys used against 7"
tablets when their beloved lord Jobs still walked the Earth: It's
even less likely an 8" mini ipad will fit in anything but a large
jacket pocket.MFBKDT
You compared a pocketable media player to a tablet.
I can't use a tablet when running.Yes you can - wear it around your neck...
It was a silly comparison.Yes, it was silly of you to compare an iPod to a 10" tablet.
Comparing an iPod Touch to a tablet is like comparing a bathtub to a pool. The use cases are different.You conveniently left off the "XL" again - how disingenuous of you, Karl.
-- "We all should vote 'forward' - just don't vote Barack-ward..."
MFB
10/29/2012-
