Google| Subject | Re: Google's answer to the iPad3 has just arrived... |
| From | Flint |
| Date | 11/03/2012 14:23 (11/03/2012 09:23) |
| Message-ID | <k735sf$c0f$1@dont-email.me> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | KDT |
| Followups | KDT (2h & 57m) |
On 11/3/2012 8:41 AM, KDT wrote:
KDTHmmm... (checking)... nope! I don't see where I used the words performance or quality of apps
On Saturday, November 3, 2012 12:10:39 AM UTC-4, Flint wrote:FlintKDT
On 11/2/2012 10:23 PM, KDT wrote:KDT
On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 6:44:23 AM UTC-4, Nashton wrote:Nashton
On 12-10-29 9:34 PM, KDT wrote:KDT
On Monday, October 29, 2012 5:29:03 PM UTC-4, Flint wrote:Flint
http://techreport.com/news/23810/google-unveils-new-nexus-devicesKDT
Besides that, Android has never been known to have great graphicsperformance.Nashton
LOLKDT
Good thing we have benchmarks....http://www.anandtech.com/show/6426/ipad-4-gpu-performance-analyzed-powervr-sgx-554mp4-under-the-hoodFlint
Which users don't really care about any more than they did about CPU
clock-speed or biodegradability on desktops.
So now users don't care about quality of apps or perforkance?
Earlier you were carping about "price/performance" so the iPad 4 is 25% more expensive but at the lowend 33% faster and depending on then benchmark 300% faster.Non sequitur duly noted.
So if users don't care about any of those things, it should be reflected in sales figures by the end of the quarter, right?
Are you predicting that users will buy more Nexus 7's than iPads?
LOL!
You'd love an open ended bet such as that, wouldn't you? :)
Can you be a little *more* vague? I noticed the "more iPads" instead of a more meaningful comparison between tablets of a similar size.
Very cagey of you, Karl.
-- "We all should vote 'forward' - just don't vote Barack-ward..."
MFB
10/29/2012-
