Google| Subject | Re: Playbook 2.0 |
| From | Nashton |
| Date | 02/29/2012 13:30 (02/29/2012 08:30) |
| Message-ID | <jil5p4$7op$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Alan Baker |
| Followups | james (59m) Alan Baker (4h & 31m) Sandman (2d, 21h & 5m) |
On 12-02-27 11:43 AM, Alan Baker wrote:
Alan BakerIf it's $400 more expensive than the Playbook or the Fire. I won't touch it. You have a hard enough time sticking to the present and the past. Let alone the future.
In article<jig7no$1tj$2@speranza.aioe.org>, Nashton<nana@no.ca> wrote:NashtonAlan Baker
On 12-02-25 6:21 PM, Bill C wrote:Bill CNashton
On Tuesday, February 21, 2012 6:17:59 PM UTC-8, Nashton wrote:NashtonBill C
Was it worth the wait? D... straight, it was!
This thing rocks and the folks at RIM deserve some kudos for the fantastic work.
This thing just rocks. Android apps work as if they were written for it, sync via gmail, email, calendars, all work like a charm.
Flash too. I get to use what is available now, not some crippled device that can't browse the web and offer users the full experience of every single website.
Well done.
My next phone: A BlackBerry.
7" tablets are too small.
10 " tablets are too big.
And the day that Apple comes out with a 7" tablet is the day you'll declare that only 6.5" tablets are the right size.
AFAIC, 7" is the ideal tablet for me, notwithstanding your silly little mind-games, the result of your wasted youth.
02/22/2012-
