ed
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 3:27:12 PM UTC-8, KDT wrote:

KDT
On Feb 28, 5:39 pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:

On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 2:12:21 PM UTC-8, KDT wrote:

On Feb 28, 3:42 pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:

On Monday, February 27, 2012 9:40:18 PM UTC-8, KDT wrote:

On Feb 26, 8:30 pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:

On Sunday, February 26, 2012 4:54:33 PM UTC-8, Devil Coffee wrote:

And it still doesn't support RIM's BES...only ActiveSync.

And the iPad won't play anything related to Flash, a real technology, used by the majority of web sites.

HTH, fanguuurl

And Adobe has discontinued Flash for mobile devices. This means no Flash for Android/etc anymore, beyond the now abandoned version sitting in the Google Market.

Flash 11 for android was updaed a whopping 11 days ago.

...

Come on ed, you know Flash is dead end on Android. How can you even spin that Flash is alive and vibrant when even Adobe admits it has no future.

wow, you read a *lot* into that post- too much, as usual! i'd like to see how you even *begin* to see what i posted as "spin"- it's a simple fact, meant to show that flash on android is not "abandoned" at this point. that does not argue for the future of flash. sheesh.

So in your worldview something is "not abandoned" when the product owner states unequivocally "this will be the last version"?

obviously not- 'last version' here obviously means flash 11, not flash 11.x.x.whatever. it'll be abandoned when updates stop. but in your worldview, you apparently consider it abandoned even though updates continue? dude.

You do realize that you're the last person on the Internet that doesn't consider Flash on mobile abandoned don't you?

ed
you're being retarded dude. it's an actively supported piece of software. yes, they're going to sunset it. that hasn't happend yet. this is not complicated, and not something to argue about.