Skip to main content
news

Re: Playbook 2.0

ed
SubjectRe: Playbook 2.0
Fromed
Date02/28/2012 23:39 (02/28/2012 14:39)
Message-ID<6935958.1037.1330468786955.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yncd8>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsKDT
FollowupsKDT (47m) > ed
KDT (56m)

On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 2:12:21 PM UTC-8, KDT wrote:

KDT
On Feb 28, 3:42=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:

ed
On Monday, February 27, 2012 9:40:18 PM UTC-8, KDT wrote:

On Feb 26, 8:30=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:

On Sunday, February 26, 2012 4:54:33 PM UTC-8, Devil Coffee wrote:

And it still doesn't support RIM's BES...only ActiveSync.

Nashton
And the iPad won't play anything related to Flash, a real techn=

ology,

used by the majority of web sites.

HTH, fanguuurl

And Adobe has discontinued Flash for mobile devices. This means n=

o

Flash for Android/etc anymore, beyond the now abandoned version s=

itting

in the Google Market.

Flash 11 for android was updaed a whopping 11 days ago.

ed
...

Come on ed, you know Flash is dead end on Android. =A0How can you eve=

n

spin that Flash is alive and vibrant when even Adobe admits it has no future.

wow, you read a *lot* into that post- too much, as usual! =A0i'd like t=

o see how you even *begin* to see what i posted as "spin"- it's a simple fa= ct, meant to show that flash on android is not "abandoned" at this point. = =A0that does not argue for the future of flash. =A0sheesh.

KDT
=20 So in your worldview something is "not abandoned" when the product owner states unequivocally "this will be the last version"?

obviously not- 'last version' here obviously means flash 11, not flash 11.x= .x.whatever. it'll be abandoned when updates stop. but in your worldview,= you apparently consider it abandoned even though updates continue? dude. = =20

KDT (47m) > ed
KDT (56m)