Subject | Re: Playbook 2.0 |
From | KDT |
Date | 02/29/2012 03:17 (02/28/2012 18:17) |
Message-ID | <01f06e95-8cb6-4bd8-9871-c8951c0f9a09@f2g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | ed |
Followups | ed (1h & 17m) > KDT |
edee wrote:
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 4:48:58 PM UTC-8, KDT wrote:KDT
On Feb 28, 6:57=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 3:27:12 PM UTC-8, KDT wrote:On Feb 28, 5:39=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 2:12:21 PM UTC-8, KDT wrote:On Feb 28, 3:42=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:On Monday, February 27, 2012 9:40:18 PM UTC-8, KDT wrote:On Feb 26, 8:30=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:On Sunday, February 26, 2012 4:54:33 PM UTC-8, Devil Coff=
Sync.And it still doesn't support RIM's BES...only Active=
real technology,Nashton
And the iPad won't play anything related to Flash, a =
is means noused by the majority of web sites.HTH, fanguuurlAnd Adobe has discontinued Flash for mobile devices. Th=
version sittingFlash for Android/etc anymore, beyond the now abandoned=
an you evenin the Google Market....Flash 11 for android was updaed a whopping 11 days ago.Come on ed, you know Flash is dead end on Android. =A0How c=
it has nospin that Flash is alive and vibrant when even Adobe admits=
i'd like to see how you even *begin* to see what i posted as "spin"- it's a= simple fact, meant to show that flash on android is not "abandoned" at thi= s point. =A0that does not argue for the future of flash. =A0sheesh.future.wow, you read a *lot* into that post- too much, as usual! =A0=
uctSo in your worldview something is "not abandoned" when the prod=
flash 11.x.x.whatever. =A0it'll be abandoned when updates stop. =A0but in y= our worldview, you apparently consider it abandoned even though updates con= tinue? =A0dude.owner states unequivocally "this will be the last version"?obviously not- 'last version' here obviously means flash 11, not =
ftware. =A0yes, they're going to sunset it. =A0that hasn't happend yet. =A0= this is not complicated, and not something to argue about.You do realize that you're the last person on the Internet that doesn't consider Flash on mobile abandoned don't you?you're being retarded dude. =A0it's an actively supported piece of so=
ort doesn't mean it's abandoned to you? =A0holy crap, everything is abandon= ed already!KDTed
No, I think it's retarded to think something is not abandoned when Adobe said they won't support any new browsers, chipsets, operating system version, or "configurations".
that is one whack definition of abandoned software- lack of *future* supp=
abandoned.KDTed
So by "actively supported" does that mean when it breaks in the next version of Android that Adobe will fix it? =A0No, not according to the official announcement.
lack of *future* support doesn't mean it's abandoned now.KDTed
So by "actively supported" does that mean when it breaks in a new browser that Adobe will fix it? Nope, not according to Adobe.
lack of *future* support doesn't mean it's abandoned now.KDTed
So by "actively supported" does that mean when it breaks because of a new "configuration" Adobe will fix it?
lack of *future* support doesn't mean it's abandoned now.KDTed
You actually consider that "supported" --- Weak
currently supported =3D=3D not abandoned. =A0lack of future support !=3D =
it might be analogy time- we can probably agree that the iphone 3gs is no=t abandoned, right? =A0we can also guess that the iphone 3gs probably won't= get the next major release of ios, right? =A0but we can also assume that t= here will be fixes to the current version that apply to it. =A0so what make= s it not abandoned, even though we know it won't be getting major updates i= n the future? =A0riiight, the *current* updates.