Skip to main content
news

Re: Playbook 2.0

ed
Google Google
SubjectRe: Playbook 2.0
Fromed
Date02/29/2012 02:10 (02/28/2012 17:10)
Message-ID<7529042.61.1330477800872.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbpw16>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsKDT
FollowupsKDT (1h & 7m) > ed
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 4:48:58 PM UTC-8, KDT wrote:

KDT
On Feb 28, 6:57=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:

ed
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 3:27:12 PM UTC-8, KDT wrote:

On Feb 28, 5:39=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:

On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 2:12:21 PM UTC-8, KDT wrote:

On Feb 28, 3:42=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:

On Monday, February 27, 2012 9:40:18 PM UTC-8, KDT wrote:

On Feb 26, 8:30=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:

On Sunday, February 26, 2012 4:54:33 PM UTC-8, Devil Coffee=

wrote:

And it still doesn't support RIM's BES...only ActiveSy=

nc.

Nashton
And the iPad won't play anything related to Flash, a re=

al technology,

used by the majority of web sites.

HTH, fanguuurl

And Adobe has discontinued Flash for mobile devices. This=

means no

Flash for Android/etc anymore, beyond the now abandoned v=

ersion sitting

in the Google Market.

Flash 11 for android was updaed a whopping 11 days ago.

...

Come on ed, you know Flash is dead end on Android. =A0How can=

you even

spin that Flash is alive and vibrant when even Adobe admits i=

t has no

future.

wow, you read a *lot* into that post- too much, as usual! =A0i'=

d like to see how you even *begin* to see what i posted as "spin"- it's a s= imple fact, meant to show that flash on android is not "abandoned" at this = point. =A0that does not argue for the future of flash. =A0sheesh.

So in your worldview something is "not abandoned" when the produc=

t

owner states unequivocally "this will be the last version"?

obviously not- 'last version' here obviously means flash 11, not fl=

ash 11.x.x.whatever. =A0it'll be abandoned when updates stop. =A0but in you= r worldview, you apparently consider it abandoned even though updates conti= nue? =A0dude.

You do realize that you're the last person on the Internet that doesn't consider Flash on mobile abandoned don't you?

ed
you're being retarded dude. =A0it's an actively supported piece of soft=

ware. =A0yes, they're going to sunset it. =A0that hasn't happend yet. =A0th= is is not complicated, and not something to argue about.

KDT
=20 No, I think it's retarded to think something is not abandoned when Adobe said they won't support any new browsers, chipsets, operating system version, or "configurations".

that is one whack definition of abandoned software- lack of *future* suppor= t doesn't mean it's abandoned to you? holy crap, everything is abandoned a= lready!

So by "actively supported" does that mean when it breaks in the next version of Android that Adobe will fix it? No, not according to the official announcement.

lack of *future* support doesn't mean it's abandoned now.

So by "actively supported" does that mean when it breaks in a new browser that Adobe will fix it? Nope, not according to Adobe.

lack of *future* support doesn't mean it's abandoned now.

So by "actively supported" does that mean when it breaks because of a new "configuration" Adobe will fix it?

lack of *future* support doesn't mean it's abandoned now.

You actually consider that "supported" --- Weak

currently supported =3D=3D not abandoned. lack of future support !=3D aban= doned. =20

it might be analogy time- we can probably agree that the iphone 3gs is not = abandoned, right? we can also guess that the iphone 3gs probably won't get= the next major release of ios, right? but we can also assume that there w= ill be fixes to the current version that apply to it. so what makes it not= abandoned, even though we know it won't be getting major updates in the fu= ture? riiight, the *current* updates.

Google
KDT (1h & 7m) > ed