Subject | Re: Playbook 2.0 |
From | KDT |
Date | 02/29/2012 00:36 (02/28/2012 15:36) |
Message-ID | <d2f174ce-8f83-464a-a684-a2079c96ff98@q12g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | ed |
edhnology,
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 2:12:21 PM UTC-8, KDT wrote:KDT
On Feb 28, 3:42=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:On Monday, February 27, 2012 9:40:18 PM UTC-8, KDT wrote:On Feb 26, 8:30=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:On Sunday, February 26, 2012 4:54:33 PM UTC-8, Devil Coffee wrote=And it still doesn't support RIM's BES...only ActiveSync.Nashton
And the iPad won't play anything related to Flash, a real tec=
noused by the majority of web sites.HTH, fanguuurlAnd Adobe has discontinued Flash for mobile devices. This means=
sittingFlash for Android/etc anymore, beyond the now abandoned version=
venin the Google Market....Flash 11 for android was updaed a whopping 11 days ago.Come on ed, you know Flash is dead end on Android. =A0How can you e=
nospin that Flash is alive and vibrant when even Adobe admits it has =
to see how you even *begin* to see what i posted as "spin"- it's a simple = fact, meant to show that flash on android is not "abandoned" at this point.= =A0that does not argue for the future of flash. =A0sheesh.future.wow, you read a *lot* into that post- too much, as usual! =A0i'd like=
.x.x.whatever. =A0it'll be abandoned when updates stop. =A0but in your worl= dview, you apparently consider it abandoned even though updates continue? = =A0dude.KDTed
So in your worldview something is "not abandoned" when the product owner states unequivocally "this will be the last version"?
obviously not- 'last version' here obviously means flash 11, not flash 11=