Google| Subject | Re: Playbook 2.0 |
| From | KDT |
| Date | 02/29/2012 19:35 (02/29/2012 10:35) |
| Message-ID | <d1a02b96-f754-4b58-b71a-ff179a17c59e@k24g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | ed |
| Followups | ed (33m) > KDT |
On Feb 29, 1:23=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:
ed=A0Do
On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 9:52:42 AM UTC-8, KDT wrote:KDT
So simple question. =A0Is Adobe's Flash supported on Google's latest browser for Android that they recently showed off? =A0Is that a bug? =
on android is sunseted though.you think they will fix it?ed
no, no, and no. =A0that, of course, has nothing to do with whether flash =
So Flash not working is not a bug? You claimed that it was still being supported. So how is not fixing a major show stopper like "not working" not a bug? As a user, if I buy the Google-approved flagship phone and run Google's hyped new browser and Adobe is still supporting Flash on Android, shouldn't I expect Flash to be able to run? Or do I need to run two separate browsers - one for Flash and one to get all of the Google Chrome goodness?
But of course, Android isn't fragmented --- not even on the same device.....
02/22/2012-
