Skip to main content
news

Re: Playbook 2.0

KDT
Google Google
SubjectRe: Playbook 2.0
FromKDT
Date02/29/2012 01:48 (02/28/2012 16:48)
Message-ID<be9bec80-40b2-4377-9018-e64f293a27e3@b1g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.sys.mac.advocacy
Followsed
Followupsed (21m) > KDT
On Feb 28, 6:57=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:

ed
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 3:27:12 PM UTC-8, KDT wrote:

KDT
On Feb 28, 5:39=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:

On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 2:12:21 PM UTC-8, KDT wrote:

On Feb 28, 3:42=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:

On Monday, February 27, 2012 9:40:18 PM UTC-8, KDT wrote:

On Feb 26, 8:30=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:

On Sunday, February 26, 2012 4:54:33 PM UTC-8, Devil Coffee w=

rote:

And it still doesn't support RIM's BES...only ActiveSync=

.

Nashton
And the iPad won't play anything related to Flash, a real=

technology,

used by the majority of web sites.

HTH, fanguuurl

And Adobe has discontinued Flash for mobile devices. This m=

eans no

Flash for Android/etc anymore, beyond the now abandoned ver=

sion sitting

in the Google Market.

Flash 11 for android was updaed a whopping 11 days ago.

...

Come on ed, you know Flash is dead end on Android. =A0How can y=

ou even

spin that Flash is alive and vibrant when even Adobe admits it =

has no

future.

wow, you read a *lot* into that post- too much, as usual! =A0i'd =

like to see how you even *begin* to see what i posted as "spin"- it's a sim= ple fact, meant to show that flash on android is not "abandoned" at this po= int. =A0that does not argue for the future of flash. =A0sheesh.

So in your worldview something is "not abandoned" when the product owner states unequivocally "this will be the last version"?

obviously not- 'last version' here obviously means flash 11, not flas=

h 11.x.x.whatever. =A0it'll be abandoned when updates stop. =A0but in your = worldview, you apparently consider it abandoned even though updates continu= e? =A0dude.

KDT
You do realize that you're the last person on the Internet that doesn't consider Flash on mobile abandoned don't you?

ed
you're being retarded dude. =A0it's an actively supported piece of softwa=

re. =A0yes, they're going to sunset it. =A0that hasn't happend yet. =A0this= is not complicated, and not something to argue about.

No, I think it's retarded to think something is not abandoned when Adobe said they won't support any new browsers, chipsets, operating system version, or "configurations".

So by "actively supported" does that mean when it breaks in the next version of Android that Adobe will fix it? No, not according to the official announcement.

So by "actively supported" does that mean when it breaks in a new browser that Adobe will fix it? Nope, not according to Adobe.

So by "actively supported" does that mean when it breaks because of a new "configuration" Adobe will fix it?

You actually consider that "supported" --- Weak

Google
ed (21m) > KDT