KDT
On Feb 29, 2:08=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:

ed
On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 10:35:02 AM UTC-8, KDT wrote:

On Feb 29, 1:23=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:

On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 9:52:42 AM UTC-8, KDT wrote:

So simple question. =A0Is Adobe's Flash supported on Google's lat=

browser for Android that they recently showed off? =A0Is that a b=

you think they will fix it?

no, no, and no. =A0that, of course, has nothing to do with whether =

So Flash not working is not a bug? You claimed that it was still bein=

supported.

adobe supporting it doesn't mean software by other companies do, nor do=

So how is not fixing a major show stopper like "not working" not a bug?

surely you jest.

As a user, if I buy the Google-approved flagship phone and run Google's hyped new browser and Adobe is still supportin=

Flash on Android, shouldn't I expect Flash to be able to run?

not if you have any sense in you - if you download a beta browser that =

KDT
=20 Okay, so do you expect Chrome for Android to ever support Flash - especially considering that Adonr said that they won't support newer browsers?

Will Google ship two browsers with Androif?

Or do I need to run two separate browsers - one for Flash and one to get all of the Google Chrome goodness?

But of course, Android isn't fragmented --- not even on the same device.....

ed
do you expect all browsers on ios to have the same capabilities? =A0i s=

...

KDT
=20 I also doubt that Apple would develop two separate browsers for the iPhone with two separate feature sets at the same time.=20