Google| Subject | Re: Ping Owl: More examples of "window 1" |
| From | Octavian W. Lagrange |
| Date | 09/23/2016 23:08 (09/23/2016 21:08) |
| Message-ID | <slkabie.atee3@perch.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (4m) > Octavian W. Lagrange |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:
SnitClarify what you mean by the "scripts windows" here?
On 9/23/16, 1:27 PM, in article e4lhidFs85nU2@mid.individual.net, "Jim Polaski" <jpolaski@linuxmail.org>wrote:Jim Polaski
On 2016-09-23, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid>wrote:Octavian W. Lagrange
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:Snit
The scripts windows are not even the ones being discussed!
So when you say "the scripts windows are not even the ones beign discussed" you are not referring to whatever window (if any) that the script might have been executed in? If not, then which "script's windows" would *you* be referring to when you said that?SnitJim PolaskiIt is the terminal windows which are having things done with them!Octavian W. Lagrange
What the FUCK are you babbling about NOW? I am NOT talking about the script's window you MORON.
Haven't you figured this out yet? It's not about what /you/ are talking about. It's about what /he/ wants to talk about.
Owl's new trolling nonsense is when he spoke of "Script1 inadvertently sends something to Script2's window" he did not mean Script2's window. LOL!
09/22/2016-
