Google| Subject | Re: Ping Owl: More examples of "window 1" |
| From | Octavian W. Lagrange |
| Date | 09/23/2016 17:31 (09/23/2016 15:31) |
| Message-ID | <hgjdasdoe8983.a3@perch.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (17m) > Octavian W. Lagrange |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:
SnitI completely understand that. That's why your script is broken.
On 9/23/16, 7:16 AM, in article fhjgi0ag.4uu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>wrote:Octavian W. LagrangeSnit
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:SnitOctavian W. Lagrange
[Reposted because it completely rips your claims apart and, gee, for some reason you skipped it. I expect you will never give a real response.]
..SnitOctavian W. Lagrange
This was just completely wrong of him! And he went on and on with this nonsense:
Owl: ----- Script 1 thinks "Window 1" is the one connected to 10.0.1.2. Script 2 thinks "Window 1" is the one connected to 192.168.1.3. See a problem yet? -----
He was just NOT getting it! The script does not own the terminal's window 1!
So you *still* don't see the problem with your broken code.
I think the bigger question is you have yet to figure out the benefit of referencing by ID instead of index. You have yet to even show you understand the window 1 of terminal is not owned by the script but by terminal.
I am so seriously *not* interested in AppleScript or Macs in general, now more than ever.SnitAnyway... enough. I have proved my point and it is 100% predictable you will still troll me and lie.Octavian W. Lagrange
What you have proven is that you're an idiot.
You can troll all you want, Owl... but I am the one who is here working to help educate you anyway. :)
Seriously, you kept asking. If you do not want to know that is fine... it is not like I HAVE to help you learn.I kept asking why you think there is no problem doing it the way you are doing it. You still have not answered. So I leave you to your cluelessness.
09/22/2016-
