Subject | Re: Ping Owl: More examples of "window 1" |
From | Snit |
Date | 09/23/2016 17:04 (09/23/2016 08:04) |
Message-ID | <D40A927E.7E240%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Octavian W. Lagrange |
Followups | Peter Kohlmann (6m) > Snit Octavian W. Lagrange (27m) > Snit |
Octavian W. LagrangeI think the bigger question is you have yet to figure out the benefit of referencing by ID instead of index. You have yet to even show you understand the window 1 of terminal is not owned by the script but by terminal.
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:SnitOctavian W. Lagrange
[Reposted because it completely rips your claims apart and, gee, for some reason you skipped it. I expect you will never give a real response.]
..SnitOctavian W. Lagrange
This was just completely wrong of him! And he went on and on with this nonsense:
Owl: ----- Script 1 thinks "Window 1" is the one connected to 10.0.1.2. Script 2 thinks "Window 1" is the one connected to 192.168.1.3. See a problem yet? -----
He was just NOT getting it! The script does not own the terminal's window 1!
So you *still* don't see the problem with your broken code.
You can troll all you want, Owl... but I am the one who is here working to help educate you anyway. :)SnitOctavian W. Lagrange
Anyway... enough. I have proved my point and it is 100% predictable you will still troll me and lie.
What you have proven is that you're an idiot.