Peter Kohlmann
Snit wrote:

Snit
On 9/23/16, 7:16 AM, in article fhjgi0ag.4uu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>wrote:

Octavian W. Lagrange
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:

Snit
[Reposted because it completely rips your claims apart and, gee, for [some reason you skipped it. I expect you will never give a real response.]

Octavian W. Lagrange
..

Snit
This was just completely wrong of him! And he went on and on with this nonsense:

Owl: ----- Script 1 thinks "Window 1" is the one connected to 10.0.1.2. Script 2 thinks "Window 1" is the one connected to 192.168.1.3. See a problem yet? -----

He was just NOT getting it! The script does not own the terminal's window 1!

Octavian W. Lagrange
So you *still* don't see the problem with your broken code.

Snit
I think the bigger question is you have yet to figure out the benefit of referencing by ID instead of index. You have yet to even show you understand the window 1 of terminal is not owned by the script but by terminal.

Peter Kohlmann
Red Herring. That "window 1" is owned by terminal was never in contention.

And *you* made that mindboggling broken code, not him. It is you who does not understand what is so broken about it, even after dozens of replies

Snit
Anyway... enough. I have proved my point and it is 100% predictable you will still troll me and lie.

Octavian W. Lagrange
What you have proven is that you're an idiot.

Snit
You can troll all you want, Owl... but I am the one who is here working to help educate you anyway. :)

Peter Kohlmann
You have never educated anyone. You are incompetent, especially on anything technical