Google| Subject | Re: Back To The Egg ... |
| From | Animal Hour |
| Date | 2002-04-13 11:22 (2002-04-13 11:22) |
| Message-ID | <20020413052235.17929.00000479@mb-fk.aol.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | alt.cult-movies.alien |
| Follows | Tracy |
In article <yoes8.4032$BH1.915560@news11-gui.server.ntli.net>, "Tracy" <sistermoonconstant@hotmail.com>writes:
Tracy
"Animal Hour" <animalhour@aol.com>wrote in message news:20020408060844.17929.00000376@mb-fk.aol.com...
In article <kL3s8.2161$AX.516310@news20.bellglobal.com>, "Glen A. RITCHIE" <glenaritchie@sympatico.ca>writes:
In "Alien", the creature that came forth from the egg (and thenceforth, Kane) on the Space Jockey's derelict was biomechanical in appearance.
Was this due to genetic engineering on the Space Jockey's home planet, or
It's due to the alien and the pilot being designed by the same guy :-)
Now, *I've* always thought that too! There's just something about the SJ - he always looked like a much larger and mature version of a face hugger (to me!!)I actually meant real-life designer H.R. Giger :-)
Although I guess that the pilot and the eggs could have been genetically engineered by a third type of alien.
2002-04-08-
