Google| Subject | Re: Back To The Egg ... |
| From | clink |
| Date | 2002-04-08 15:00 (2002-04-08 15:00) |
| Message-ID | <a8s4ae$361$1@news.onet.pl> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | alt.cult-movies.alien |
| Follows | Tracy |
| Followups | Glen A. RITCHIE (5h & 4m) Animal Hour (22h & 31m) Animal Hour (4d, 20h & 21m) |
Let's not go so far away from what was said in Alien. This ship was presumably due to deliver those eggs somewhere. Space Jockey had been impregnated accidentally - hence the crash on LV426.
but what about the alien that the Space Jockey gave birth to?
Why do you think that this facehugger was biomechanical in appearance?
U?ytkownik "Tracy" <sistermoonconstant@hotmail.com>napisa? w wiadomo?ci news:yoes8.4032$BH1.915560@news11-gui.server.ntli.net...
TracyRITCHIE"
"Animal Hour" <animalhour@aol.com>wrote in message news:20020408060844.17929.00000376@mb-fk.aol.com...Animal Hour
In article <kL3s8.2161$AX.516310@news20.bellglobal.com>, "Glen A.
or<glenaritchie@sympatico.ca>writes:Glen A. RITCHIE
In "Alien", the creature that came forth from the egg (and thenceforth, Kane) on the Space Jockey's derelict was biomechanical in appearance.
Was this due to genetic engineering on the Space Jockey's home planet,
SJ -Animal HourTracy
It's due to the alien and the pilot being designed by the same guy :-)
Now, *I've* always thought that too! There's just something about the
he always looked like a much larger and mature version of a face hugger(to
me!!)
2002-04-08-
