Subject | Re: Picture of a CSMA regular? |
From | §¼¡Ý |
Date | 04/29/2004 01:06 (04/28/2004 16:06) |
Message-ID | <BCB586F5.4C720%snit@nospam.cableone.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Nash*ton |
Followups | Steve Carroll (1h & 42m) |
Nash*tonWho has enemies... Steve Carroll claims he does not dislike me. If what he says is an example of the words of someone who does not dislike me, I must be the most popular person in here. :)
Sandman wrote:SandmanNash*ton
In article <PiQjc.31373$Np3.1116078@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>, Nash*ton <Nash@nash.com>wrote:SandmanNash*tonSteve Mackay§¼¡ÝSandman
Anyone recognize this writing style from someone else on this NG....
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4146756343
Didn't you say you would take your trolling to another group? I believed you.
What do you think the "Hacking attempt" post was about. It was nothing but a troll to discredit Steve C. Or myself. No matter, I doubt ANYONE believes him.
Birds of a feather... I see your Carroll's SP now, his apologist and his advocate. No surprise there, it's just seldom that one sees a mob-like mentality in a group of ...2 people..;)
Funny, that's just how many you and Michael are. :)
Did you ever stop to notice that you are the only one in the -entire group- that is coming to Michaels support?
Nope, I don't need validation. You seem to need it and project this upon me. So let me get this straight. In order for you to agree/disagree with somebody, do you make sure your opinion is in tandem with the others?
Interesting, to say the least.SandmanNash*ton
I know why of course - he just happens to have the same enemies as you do - you have made it quite clear that you in no shape for form actually support Michaels -views-.
Enemies? LOL I hardly take anything posted in this ng seriously enough to consider anybody an enemy...