Google| Subject | Re: Picture of a CSMA regular? |
| From | §¼¡Ý |
| Date | 04/28/2004 20:39 (04/28/2004 11:39) |
| Message-ID | <BCB5488D.4C643%snit@nospam.cableone.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (10m) > §¼¡Ý |
"Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote in mr-E459DD.20363328042004@news.fu-berlin.de on 4/28/04 11:36 AM:
SandmanI notice you have once again not commented on any objective criteria in which I am any more of a troll that you or many other people in csma.
In article <BCB512A3.4C437%snit@nospam.cableone.com>, ?? <snit@nospam.cableone.com>wrote:Sandman§¼¡ÝSandman§¼¡Ý§¼¡ÝSandman
Anyone recognize this writing style from someone else on this NG....
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4146756343
Didn't you say you would take your trolling to another group? I believed you.
Actually, I am responding to most, though not all, troll/flame posts in another group.
So you will continue to troll this group? If that's the case, I'll take back the sincere "Thank you" I posted the other day were I actually believed you wouldn't troll this group any more. I thought you did a good thing, apparently it was only hot air.
I did doubt your sincerity. Seems I was right to do so.
Since you are a troll, what you think is irrelevant.Sandman§¼¡Ý§¼¡ÝSandman
In any case, any comments on the link?
Yes, you are a troll.
Care to define what objective criteria you use to make such a judgement?
You are trolling, hence you are a troll. Your stupidity act where you desperatly try to act as if you're not trolling - is trolling.
Gee, I wonder why that is...
-- See responses to flames news://alt.flame.macintosh
04/28/2004-
