Google| Subject | Re: Picture of a CSMA regular? |
| From | §¼¡Ý |
| Date | 04/28/2004 20:56 (04/28/2004 11:56) |
| Message-ID | <BCB54C60.4C654%snit@nospam.cableone.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (47m) > §¼¡Ý |
"Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote in mr-D429F1.20495728042004@news.fu-berlin.de on 4/28/04 11:49 AM:
SandmanSoooooo.....
In article <BCB5488D.4C643%snit@nospam.cableone.com>, ???? <snit@nospam.cableone.com>wrote:Sandman§¼¡Ý§¼¡ÝSandman
Care to define what objective criteria you use to make such a judgement?
You are trolling, hence you are a troll. Your stupidity act where you desperatly try to act as if you're not trolling - is trolling.
I notice you have once again not commented on any objective criteria in which I am any more of a troll that you or many other people in csma.
Gee, I wonder why that is...
Because you're a troll Michael, and as such you are here to play games instead of listening to logic and reason. It is what you do. I, along with a lot of other posters, have already given you explanations on a wide array of subjects and you have time after time made it perfectly clear that you won't listen to that.
What is your objective criteria for calling someone a troll?
-- See responses to flames news://alt.flame.macintosh
04/28/2004-
