Google| Subject | Re: Picture of a CSMA regular? |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 04/28/2004 21:43 (04/28/2004 21:43) |
| Message-ID | <mr-B0A772.21431928042004@news.fu-berlin.de> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | §¼¡Ý |
| Followups | Nash*ton (2h & 53m) > Sandman §¼¡Ý (3h & 20m) > Sandman |
In article <BCB54C60.4C654%snit@nospam.cableone.com>, ?? <snit@nospam.cableone.com>wrote:
See what I mean?§¼¡ÝSandman§¼¡Ý§¼¡ÝSandman
Care to define what objective criteria you use to make such a judgement?
You are trolling, hence you are a troll. Your stupidity act where you desperatly try to act as if you're not trolling - is trolling.
I notice you have once again not commented on any objective criteria in which I am any more of a troll that you or many other people in csma.
Gee, I wonder why that is...
Because you're a troll Michael, and as such you are here to play games instead of listening to logic and reason. It is what you do. I, along with a lot of other posters, have already given you explanations on a wide array of subjects and you have time after time made it perfectly clear that you won't listen to that.
Soooooo.....
What is your objective criteria for calling someone a troll?
-- Sandman[.net]
04/28/2004-
