Google| Subject | Re: Picture of a CSMA regular? |
| From | §¼¡Ý |
| Date | 04/29/2004 01:03 (04/28/2004 16:03) |
| Message-ID | <BCB5866A.4C71E%snit@nospam.cableone.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Steve Mackay (1h & 23m) > §¼¡Ý Sandman (16h & 12m) > §¼¡Ý |
"Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote in mr-B0A772.21431928042004@news.fu-berlin.de on 4/28/04 12:43 PM:
SandmanYes, I see that you have no objective criteria for determining if someone is a troll.
In article <BCB54C60.4C654%snit@nospam.cableone.com>, ?? <snit@nospam.cableone.com>wrote:Sandman§¼¡ÝSandman§¼¡Ý§¼¡ÝSandman
Care to define what objective criteria you use to make such a judgement?
You are trolling, hence you are a troll. Your stupidity act where you desperatly try to act as if you're not trolling - is trolling.
I notice you have once again not commented on any objective criteria in which I am any more of a troll that you or many other people in csma.
Gee, I wonder why that is...
Because you're a troll Michael, and as such you are here to play games instead of listening to logic and reason. It is what you do. I, along with a lot of other posters, have already given you explanations on a wide array of subjects and you have time after time made it perfectly clear that you won't listen to that.
Soooooo.....
What is your objective criteria for calling someone a troll?
See what I mean?
You think I am a troll because you *feel* that way.
-- See responses to flames news://alt.flame.macintosh
04/28/2004-
