Google| Subject | Re: iPad power supply unit (was: Re: Adobe's Low hanging) |
| From | Tony Cooper |
| Date | 2014-07-31 17:24 (2014-07-31 11:24) |
| Message-ID | <emnkt95rtinh9u2j0gvndgoppclkdde3bl@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (16h & 11m) Whisky-dave (17h & 53m) |
On 31 Jul 2014 07:01:21 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
SandmanYes, it certainly does divert the discussion when someone jumps in and points out that the actual meaning of the word is different from the meaning used.
No, when anyone focuses on alternate meanings of words, or detailed interpretations of words, to divert the discussion away from topic, it's a troll tactic. You would know, you do it *all the time*.
When you say "detailed interpretations", I assume you mean "the actual meaning".
One is an illiteracy based on not understanding common rules of grammar, and the other is a typo. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando FLTony CooperSandman
The ironic thing about Popinjay writing "Semantics, the trolls [sic] last resort"
It's so utterly hilarious to have you try to be sarcastic about "trolls" and "troll's" in a post where you wrote "semanitics".
2014-07-10-
