Google| Subject | Re: Adobe's Low hanging .... ? |
| From | Tony Cooper |
| Date | 2014-07-24 02:17 (2014-07-23 20:17) |
| Message-ID | <jaj0t91uicfs98es9pdvovj13mh9to8mrr@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 09:06:20 +1200, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:
Eric StevensI was.
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:29:57 -0400, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:Tony CooperEric Stevens
On 23 Jul 2014 07:47:36 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:Eric StevensSandman
You shoull add the word 'completely' to your English vocabulary.
As well as the word "shoull"?Still doing his darnest to ignore that he was wrong and would rather die than admit his error.Tony Cooper
In another group in which I participate, the term "Skitt's Law" is used to identify the situation in which a person corrects another person's spelling error...and makes a spelling error in the same post.
I wasn't referring to Sandman's spelling
I haven't followed this thread segment, but - as I understand it - it's about whether or not a switch is outside or inside a device like an iPhone.
To me, the switch is both internal and external if it protrudes, in any way, through the surface; that is, mounted in the surface.
I do know that if anyone says it's all inside, that nospam will argue that it's outside. If anyone says it's all outside, nospam will argue that it's inside. Whatever position is taken, nospam will argue the opposite.
If two other people are involved, and one says "inside" and the other says "outside", nospam will argue with both of them saying the opposite.
-- Tony Cooper - Orlando FL
2014-07-10-
