Google| Subject | Re: iPad power supply unit (was: Re: Adobe's Low hanging) |
| From | Eric Stevens |
| Date | 2014-07-26 02:11 (2014-07-26 12:11) |
| Message-ID | <acs5t95b6cdunmrrms3opujgvaq1cdoifa@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:44:10 -0400, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:
Tony CooperI've just realised the extent to which that comment applies to Sandman. However, he masquerades as another person. He makes his arguments by hidden deletions and distortions which although created by Sandman look as though they come from the other party. That way he does his best to ensure he is on the winning side. --
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:55:00 +1200, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:Tony CooperSandmanEric Stevens
How many days will you argue about this this time?
I can stop at this point. Most people will be able to readily see how much you have to twist your argument in order to stay in the game.
It breaks me up to see nospam and Sandman comment about how much someone argues. For there to be an argument, two or more people must be involved. All arguments in posts are responses to someone else's post, and it's usually nospam that makes the argumentative first reply.
It is possible for one person to argue with himself, though. One sometimes sees one of those severely delusional people walking down the street carrying on an argument with himself. When I see one, I often wonder if it's nospam.
Regards,
Eric Stevens
2014-07-10-
