Skip to main content
news

Re: grammar was: Adobe's Lo...

John McWilliams
SubjectRe: grammar was: Adobe's Low hanging .... ?
FromJohn McWilliams
Date2014-07-11 20:10 (2014-07-11 11:10)
Message-ID<lpp9av$cok$1@dont-email.me>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsSavageduck
FollowupsSavageduck (4h & 18m)

On 7/11/14 PDT, 11:01 AM, Savageduck wrote:

Savageduck
On 2014-07-11 17:48:44 +0000, John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net>said:

John McWilliams
On 7/10/14 PDT, 2:43 PM, Savageduck wrote:

Savageduck
The reality was the Cloud services were down for about 18 hours, and at no time did subscribers lose access to the CC Apps. It certainly effected those who were dependent on CC services for collaborative work and online publishing, however, what happened was not catastrophic.

There were always other means of delivering/sharing or collaborating while the CC services were down, DB, or Box for example. Particularly since the CC apps never stopped running.

John McWilliams
Wouldn't bring this up except the very word was discussed recently: s/b "affected"

Savageduck
So? My use of "effected" is appropriate.

Possibly, but it's stilted!

Let's go back and discuss "curmudgeonly"! :)

Savageduck (4h & 18m)