Google| Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
| From | Robert Coe |
| Date | 2013-12-18 03:11 (2013-12-17 21:11) |
| Message-ID | <gt02b9d49cu6vn72gtdq3fr2tb88gdld4p@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | nospam |
| Followups | nospam (4m) |
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:40:45 -0500, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>wrote:
nospamThe headers say no such thing. There is at least one article in the thread that was posted the day before I posted my article. If you can't see it, perhaps you should have a talk with your Usenet service provider.
In article <prj0b9tfe2ahfp3j0mrj2kc5gmdfo0637b@4ax.com>, Robert Coe <bob@1776.COM>wrote:Robert Coenospam
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:20:49 -0800, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>wrote: : On 2013-12-17 04:04:52 +0000, Robert Coe <bob@1776.COM>said: : : >On Sat, 07 Dec 2013 11:04:24 -0500, Robert Coe <bob@1776.COM>wrote: : >: On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 04:24:14 -0800, Savageduck : ><savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> : >: wrote:
...Robert Coenospam
: >What doesn't make sense to me is my participation in this ridiculous, : >rambling, time-wasting thread. : : Then why did you bother to resuscitate it by responding to your own 9 : day old post?
I didn't "resuscitate" it. It had been posted to as recently as the day before.
the headers say otherwise.
Bob
2013-11-30-
-
