Skip to main content
news

Re: converting raw images f...

Eric Stevens
SubjectRe: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D
FromEric Stevens
Date2013-12-05 10:32 (2013-12-05 22:32)
Message-ID<8lh0a9tu9ql767vl3u831ug3auer0etemq@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
Followsnospam
Followupsnospam (7h & 18m) > Eric Stevens

On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 23:41:36 -0500, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

nospam
In article <3nev9917ml1qia8dnio21g19svqtffiqg8@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:

Eric Stevens
How do you think they know what needs adjusting? They know because the driver tells them. There will be discussion over the details (as no adjustment affects only one aspect of the car's performance) but the top drivers have major technical input.

nospam
they can report the symptoms they encountered and offer input as to how the car is performing. drivers do that every day when they bring a car in for service.

however, they don't need to know how to fix the car or tune it to perform the way they want. that's for the mechanics to do.

Eric Stevens
All the top drivers have consideraable insight into the operation of the car and input into the way the car is set up. No two cars in the top teams handle the same way: they have been individually setup to the requirements of the individual drivers.

nospam
they have insight in how to race and what they need out of the car.

... and how to get it out of the car.

they don't need to know auto mechanics to do that, although they might want to.

see the difference?

I think you are trying to make a difference where there isn't one. If you are of above average intelligence, competitive, and have been driving racing machinery for eight or more years, why should you not have a top of te line understanding of why the car does what it does?

Eric Stevens
The problem is that you have a narrow understanding. It's up to the architect to decide where he wants to. It's the programmer who has to take him. This only works if the architect has some understanding of what is possible.

nospam
he doesn't need to know what's possible and it's probably better if he doesn't.

Eric Stevens
Haw!

nospam
what's so funny?

The idea that a top line architect wouldn't/shouldn't have an understanding of what he can an cannot do with the tools at his disposal.

kids don't know (yet) what's possible or not and their imaginations sometimes gets adults thinking in ways they wouldn't otherwise and sometimes the kids themselves come up with new ideas the adults thought weren't possible.

he might think something is not possible and then not ask for it, not realizing that someone who knows more than he does can do it and might even have already done it in another project.

i've seen that happen a lot.

Eric Stevens
Top architects/engineers do not work that way. They are always pushing the limits.

nospam
the better ones do.

That's my point.

ask for the impossible, then see how close you can get. if you have the best engineers, you might be surprised.

If you don't know what can be done, you wont't ask for it.

as i said, i've seen it happen, and it's not that rare. sometimes you have to think out of the box.

Which you can only do if you know where the box supposedly is. --

Regards,

Eric Stevens

nospam (7h & 18m) > Eric Stevens