Google| Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 2013-12-06 18:42 (2013-12-06 12:42) |
| Message-ID | <061220131242350343%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | PeterN |
In article <l7spae02h52@news6.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>wrote:
nope. you're the one doing the twisting, trying to narrow it into a specific niche. this is about photographers, not a specific type of one.PeterNnospamPeterNPeterNnospam
Is it your claim that in the film days, a good photo artist did not have to understand the how and why of film. He did not have to understand masking with film, the effect of various chemicals, and light sources on things such as contrast, and grain?
my claim is that in film days, knowing how and being proficient in darkroom work was not required.
Not require for what. Snapshots and i've been there images, you are right.
you finally figured it out.
Yep. You tried to twist my comment into something that was not said.
Look at the words included in my comment. "good photo artist" I said nothing apout casual shooters.*you* brought up good photo artist. this was never about any particular type of photographer.
Thank you for proving my point about your dishonest arguments.it backfired, showing just how big of a liar you really are.
2013-11-30-
-
