Google| Subject | Re: converting raw images from Canon EOS 600D |
| From | sid |
| Date | 2013-12-04 12:39 (2013-12-04 11:39) |
| Message-ID | <14441321.QmDcE0a0vB@thecrap.blueyonder.co.uk> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Savageduck |
| Followups | nospam (5h & 24m) |
Savageduck wrote:
SavageduckThat's just about the most arrogant and pompous thing I've read in, well actually only a day or two, you sound more like Jonas on a daily basis! How the heck does having a neutral point of view mean Tony shouldn't comment on what he wants?
Since you are apparently attempting to take a neutral stance regarding this particular debate, perhaps the time has come for you stop any further commentary in this specific sub-thread.
You are missing the point and are not prepared to make any sort of comparison yourself. Strangely enough neither are the protagonists on the other side of this discussion.I assume you are partly refering to me with that statement, in which case that is bullshit too as I have stated in another post that I have tried PS running on osx but I haven't tried lightroom. And more to the point I described the experience as alien, not as complete garbage just because it was not what I'm used to. Unlike you I have not denigrated your choice because it's not what I'm used to and I haven't invested years in learning to use it. Just because, in your brief look at GIMP, you couldn't find alternatives to your favourite methods does not mean that someone used to GIMP couldn't. In fact the only thing not achievable is your content aware fill/move. Big deal!
-- sid
2013-11-30-
-
