Subject | Re: MacBook Pro's at JPL |
From | -hh |
Date | 08/09/2013 17:12 (08/09/2013 08:12) |
Message-ID | <67245dbd-6984-478d-91a4-6e02786dc916@googlegroups.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Nashton |
Followups | Nashton (13d, 1h & 40m) |
NashtonThat was a tangent that I didn't directly comment on.
On 8/8/2013 11:14 PM, Nashton wrote:On 8/8/2013 10:21 PM, -hh wrote:-hhNashton
More reading comprehension FAIL for you Nicky:
the OP was the one who made the claim, not me. I only offered a 'what is?' for the "Who".
Not at all. The discussion was whether Macs were excempt from cuts at the JPL.
Even though I didn't comment on it directly, **IF** you had a clue about what the National Labs are and how they're funded/run, you would understand that it actually is relevant.You chimed in, with your usual irrelevant bullcrap and plastered a link with no connection to the discussion.
No, that's just you lashing out in an attempt to blame others for your own ignorance.You're quite the slime-ball, habeeb.
Crickets.From only 4 hours since your prior post? Sorry, but some of us actually have something called a "Life". Perhaps you should try it yourself, so as to spend some more time with your children ... oh, but then they would realize that you're note only a loser but alsoa bigot: no wonder you troll CSMA instead! ;-)