Subject | Re: MacBook Pro's at JPL |
From | Nobody (Edwin) |
Date | 08/22/2013 03:13 (08/21/2013 20:13) |
Message-ID | <kv3ojg$83u$1@news.albasani.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Alan Baker |
Followups | Alan Baker (3m) > Nobody (Edwin) |
Alan BakerI see you subscribe to the notion one can make a thing true by repeating it enough times.
In article <kv3nb1$5vs$1@news.albasani.net>, Nobody <nobody@invalid.com>wrote:Nobody (Edwin)Alan Baker
On 8/21/2013 7:28 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerNobody (Edwin)
In article <kv3k46$sqa$1@news.albasani.net>, Nobody <nobody@invalid.com>wrote:Nobody (Edwin)Alan Baker
On 8/21/2013 5:21 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerNobody (Edwin)
In article <kv31la$ool$1@news.albasani.net>, Nobody <nobody@invalid.com>wrote:Nobody (Edwin)Alan Baker
On 8/5/2013 3:03 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerNobody (Edwin)
In article <ktmekq$6pe$1@news.albasani.net>, Nobody <invalid@invalid.com>wrote:NobodyAlan Baker
Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerNobody
In article <ktji4m$io0$2@news.albasani.net>, Nobody <invalid@invalid.com>wrote:NobodyAlan Baker
Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerNobody
In article <jvoa4p$s1e$1@news.albasani.net>, Nobody <invalid@invalid.com>wrote:NobodyAlan Baker
On 8/6/2012 1:48 AM, Mike wrote:MikeNobody
Quite a few around the control room at JPL.
Oh wait, the trolls say Macs are only for graphics!
US tax payers can be happy their money is buying some nice toys.
Riiiight.
Because magically, the Mac is exempt from cost-cutting at NASA.
LOL
So you're saying there isn't a lot of Macs at the JPL?
I'm saying that despite budget cuts there are clearly people at JPL who value having a Mac enough to spend the money.
So they are spending tax payer money on fancy toys, in spite of your claim budget cuts prevent this.
Your statements are based on a false premise which itself is based on your biases.
My statements are based on what you wrote.Alan BakerNobody (Edwin)
Since you don't like Macs, you assume they're "fancy toys".
You have it backwards. Since Macs are fancy, overpriced toys, you assume I don't like them.
Sorry,
You ought to be!Alan BakerNobody (Edwin)
but there you are: assuming they are "fancy, overpriced toys".
I assumed nothing.
Sure you did.
Incorrect.
You assumed Macs are "fancy, overpriced toys"
when the evidence is that they are the choice of those who really need good computing: literally in this case, rocket scientists.Your assumptions are not evidence of any kind. You haven't shown who at the JPL is buying Macs, nor shown anything but their contempt for the taxpayers who foot their bills.
It only shows your earlier remarks about the effect of budget cuts on the purchase of expensive toys were incorrect.Alan BakerNobody (Edwin)Alan BakerNobody (Edwin)Alan BakerThe simpler conclusion is that if people are still buying Macs when there is a cash crunch, it's probably because they value them highly for their needs.Nobody (Edwin)
More likely it's because they don't value the taxpayers' hard-earned money as much as they do their fancy toys.
Based on your prior assumptions...
Incorrect.Did your fingers get too tired to type a response?Strange that a Canadian is justifying the spending of U.S. tax dollars...
I noted that people who have the means to choose whatever tool works best for them... ...are choosing Macs in larger numbers.
Point out the place you noted that. Your unsupported assumption was simply that people at the JPL must need Macs because they're using U.S. taxpayer money to buy them, in spite of claiming they weren't immune to budget cuts.
The fact that they continue to buy them in the face of budget cuts makes my case stronger.
How much does Apple pay you to shill?Alan Baker:-)Nobody (Edwin)
You forgot to explain why you're justifying the spending of U.S. tax dollars, smiley. The obvious answer is you're a paid Apple shill.
LOL