Subject | Re: MacBook Pro's at JPL |
From | Nashton |
Date | 08/22/2013 19:25 (08/22/2013 14:25) |
Message-ID | <kv5hi1$o8b$4@speranza.aioe.org> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Nobody (Edwin) |
Followups | Alan Baker (5m) |
Nobody (Edwin)
On 8/21/2013 8:16 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan Baker
In article <kv3ojg$83u$1@news.albasani.net>, Nobody <nobody@invalid.com>wrote:
I see you share the same disdain for shills who, most of the time, are dumber than a bag of hammers.Nobody (Edwin)Alan BakerNobody (Edwin)Alan BakerNobody (Edwin)Alan BakerBased on your prior assumptions...Nobody (Edwin)
Incorrect.Did your fingers get too tired to type a response?Strange that a Canadian is justifying the spending of U.S. tax dollars...
I noted that people who have the means to choose whatever tool works best for them... ...are choosing Macs in larger numbers.
Point out the place you noted that. Your unsupported assumption was simply that people at the JPL must need Macs because they're using U.S. taxpayer money to buy them, in spite of claiming they weren't immune to budget cuts.
The fact that they continue to buy them in the face of budget cuts makes my case stronger.
It only shows your earlier remarks about the effect of budget cuts on the purchase of expensive toys were incorrect.
LOL
More laughing? Can't think of answers?Nobody (Edwin)Alan BakerNobody (Edwin)Alan BakerAlan BakerNobody (Edwin)
:-)
You forgot to explain why you're justifying the spending of U.S. tax dollars, smiley. The obvious answer is you're a paid Apple shill.
LOL
How much does Apple pay you to shill?
It's so much easier than actually engaging in argument of your points, isn't it?
Asks the guy who answers with "LOL" as if he gets paid a penny every time he does!Alan BakerNobody (Edwin)
But then, you've lost so many arguments, haven't you?
Have I?Alan Baker
:-)