Google| Subject | Re: They may have to settle for an Android phone... |
| From | Nashton |
| Date | 03/17/2014 01:35 (03/16/2014 21:35) |
| Message-ID | <lg5g12$qd$1@dont-email.me> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Flint |
On 2014-03-15 11:25 PM, Flint wrote:
Flintst And "one* "study" proves that people really want an iPhone, but purchase another brand in *all* emerging markets, even though other manufacturers produce high end phones that cost just much as iPhones and that are doing quite well on a global scale *and* mopping the floor with Apple crap.
On 3/15/2014 10:07 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan Baker
On 2014-03-16 01:57:45 +0000, Flint said:FlintAlan Baker
On 3/14/2014 8:16 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerFlint
On 2014-03-14 21:14:21 +0000, Flint said:On 3/14/2014 2:11 PM, Alan Baker wrote:How does what YOU do change what people in emerging markets want?...but people really want iPhones. :-)riiight. that's why I just picked up a Samsung Galaxy Note III on the verizon edge program and will be upgrading to an LG G3 phablet in a few months
if v 'emerging markets', you're simply referring to BRIC markets, perhaps you have point. BUT, this is the good ole US, and the success Samsung has had getting the phablet phone to take off simply refutes your blanket claim that people "really want iPhones."
And your purchase of a Galaxy NOTE proves that success exists, does it?
How facking stupid are you, anyhow?
Flint
no, it simply proves that there is a market that values phones other than iphones.
03/14/2014-
